Put a team of investigators on every incident.
calling deploys specialized agents in parallel to trace alerts, telemetry, code, and runbooks—then returns evidence-backed hypotheses for your team to approve.
A clearer path to diagnosis
Less correlation work. More confidence in what comes next.
Investigate in parallel
Specialized agents inspect telemetry, dependencies, code changes, and runbooks at the same time.
Trace every claim
Hypotheses arrive ranked with the evidence that supports them—not as an unexplained answer.
Keep humans in control
calling stays read-only and recommends next steps for an engineer to review and approve.
One incident, multiple threads
The investigation moves in parallel.
Instead of asking one general agent to reason through everything in sequence, calling assigns focused investigators and synthesizes their findings into a reviewable brief.
Signal
An incident opens
Start from the alert and the context your team already has.
Parallel work
Agents gather evidence
Independent investigators follow the most relevant technical threads.
Synthesis
Findings are ranked
Contradictions, supporting evidence, and open questions stay visible.
Decision
Your team chooses
Engineers approve the next step before anything changes in production.
Evidence before action
Built to investigate, not operate production.
calling keeps the boundary explicit: agents gather context and recommend next steps; engineers own the decision and the change.
Investigation brief
Ranked hypothesis
Recent change aligns with the first error spike
Supported by deployment timing and correlated service behavior. Dependency evidence remains open.
Code evidence
Supporting
Telemetry evidence
Supporting
Start with the evidence
Give your on-call team a better first hour.
See how a read-only team can turn scattered incident context into a focused, human-approved next step.
Return to the overview